We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.
This includes personalizing content and advertising.
By pressing "Accept All" or closing out of this banner, you consent to the use of all cookies and similar technologies and the sharing of information they collect with third parties.
You can reject marketing cookies by pressing "Deny Optional," but we still use essential, performance, and functional cookies.
In addition, whether you "Accept All," Deny Optional," click the X or otherwise continue to use the site, you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, revised from time to time.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
Lamar vs. OUTFRONT: Which OOH Advertising REIT Is the Better Buy Now?
Read MoreHide Full Article
Key Takeaways
Lamar posted Q1 2026 net revenues 4.5% to $528M, with growth across OOH formats.
OUT saw Q1 revenues 10% and adjusted OIBDA 56%, fueled by a 22% jump in transit revenue.
Lamar carries 3x net debt/EBITDA, $700M liquidity and 2026 programmatic revenues up nearly 25%.
Out-of-home advertising is having a useful moment for investors to revisit. Brands are still fighting for attention in crowded digital channels, while billboards, transit displays and airport media keep showing up in the real world where people cannot scroll past them.
Lamar Advertising (LAMR - Free Report) and OUTFRONT Media (OUT - Free Report) both sit in this market, but they bring different strengths to the table. Lamar is the steadier operator, with a larger revenue base, strong billboard exposure and a long record of local advertiser demand.
OUTFRONT is more of a recovery story, helped by faster recent growth in transit, digital and large urban markets. The latest quarterly results show both companies moving in the right direction, though in different ways. For investors, the choice comes down to whether they prefer Lamar’s consistency and financial flexibility or OUTFRONT’s sharper rebound and improving transit platform.
The Case for LAMR
Lamar’s first appeal is its dependable top-line engine. First-quarter 2026 net revenues rose 4.5% to $528 million, with growth across billboards, airports, transit and logo signs. It came from a larger base and showed healthy demand from both local and national advertisers. Management also noted that local and regional billboard sales have now grown for 20 straight quarters, a useful sign of repeat demand.
The company also has a strong profitability profile. Adjusted EBITDA increased 7.7% to $226.3 million, and the margin expanded to 42.9%. OUTFRONT’s rebound was sharper in the quarter, but Lamar still operates with a much higher earnings margin, helped by its heavy billboard mix and disciplined expense control. That efficiency makes each dollar of revenues more valuable.
Lamar’s balance sheet gives it another edge. Management reported net debt-to-EBITDA of about 3X, total liquidity of more than $700 million and no senior notes maturity until 2028. OUTFRONT’s net leverage is higher at 4.3X, so Lamar has more room to invest, pursue deals and support shareholder returns through different market conditions.
Growth is not missing either. Programmatic revenues grew nearly 25% in the quarter, same-board digital revenues increased 5%, and digital represented almost 31% of billboard billings. Lamar also completed 19 acquisitions for about $80 million so far in 2026 and continues to target accretive billboard deals and easements under its best locations. That mix of organic growth, digital expansion and bolt-on acquisitions keeps the story simple and attractive to investors today.
The Case for OUT
OUTFRONT’s case begins with momentum. First-quarter 2026 revenues rose 10% to $429.6 million, while adjusted OIBDA climbed 56.4% to $100.4 million. AFFO more than doubled to $61 million. Those numbers show a business moving past a weaker period and getting better operating lift from its assets. Compared with Lamar’s steadier pace, OUTFRONT offers a more visible recovery story.
Transit is the clearest improvement. Revenues in that segment rose 22.3%, led by strength in the New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“MTA”) contract, which management said grew more than 26%. Digital transit revenues also rose strongly. If the MTA business stays above its baseline revenue level, OUTFRONT can begin recouping prior screen investments, improving cash dynamics over time. This could make the platform more productive.
OUTFRONT also has a good digital growth story. Total digital revenues grew more than 11% and made up about one-third of total revenues. Programmatic and automated digital sales rose nearly 40%, showing better traction with buyers who want data, flexibility and measurable campaigns. Its big-city footprint could also benefit from events, tourism and tech advertiser demand, which gives OUTFRONT real upside if demand keeps building.
The downside is that OUTFRONT still carries more execution risk than Lamar. Transit improved sharply, but it still posted a small adjusted OIBDA loss in the quarter. Leverage was 4.3X, above Lamar’s level, and some of its first-quarter strength included billboard condemnation revenues. Its exit from a large Los Angeles billboard contract also creates some moving parts in year-over-year comparisons. Investors still need proof that progress can last longer. The turnaround is promising, but it is not yet as clean or as steady as Lamar’s model.
How Do Estimates Compare for LAMR & OUT?
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Lamar’s 2026 and 2027 sales implies year-over-year growth of 5.02% and 4.22%, respectively. The consensus mark for 2026 and 2027 funds from operations (FFO) per share has been revised meaningfully higher to $8.81 and $9.40, respectively, over the past two months, suggesting year-over-year growth of 6.66% and 6.75%, respectively.
Estimates for Lamar Advertising:
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for OUTFRONT Media’s 2026 and 2027 sales indicates year-over-year growth of 8.09% and 1.49%, respectively. The consensus mark for 2026 and 2027 FFO per share has been revised upward over the past two months to $2.26 and $2.30, respectively. The figure suggests year-over-year increases of 13.57% and 1.99%, respectively.
Estimates for OUTFRONT Media:
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Price Performance & Valuation of LAMR & OUT
So far in the quarter, Lamar shares have rallied 19%, and OUTFRONT Media stock has gained 14.5%. In comparison, the Zacks REIT and Equity Trust – Other industry has risen 11.4%, whereas the S&P 500 composite has returned 12% in the same time frame.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
LAMR is trading at a forward 12-month price-to-FFO, which is a commonly used multiple for valuing REITs, of 16.62X, which is above its one-year median of 15.40X.
OUT is presently trading at a forward 12-month price-to-FFO of 13.34X, which is also above its one-year median of 12.08X. While OUT has a Value Score of B, LAMR has a Value Score of C.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Conclusion: LAMR Has the Edge
OUTFRONT deserves credit for a much better quarter. Its transit recovery, digital push and stronger urban demand give investors a real reason to keep watching the name. Still, Lamar looks like the better stock to consider. It has a larger and steadier revenue base, stronger margins, lower leverage and more room to keep acquiring assets while supporting its dividend policy.
Lamar’s growth may look less dramatic than OUTFRONT’s rebound, but it comes with fewer moving parts and a more proven model. For investors seeking exposure to OOH advertising REITs, Lamar offers the cleaner and more dependable choice in this matchup. Estimate revisions also point in the same direction.
Note: Anything related to earnings presented in this write-up represents funds from operations (FFO) — a widely used metric to gauge the performance of REITs.
Zacks' 7 Best Strong Buy Stocks (New Research Report)
Valued at $99, click below to receive our just-released report
predicting the 7 stocks that will soar highest in the coming month.
View the Zacks #1 Rank List
Image: Bigstock
Lamar vs. OUTFRONT: Which OOH Advertising REIT Is the Better Buy Now?
Key Takeaways
Out-of-home advertising is having a useful moment for investors to revisit. Brands are still fighting for attention in crowded digital channels, while billboards, transit displays and airport media keep showing up in the real world where people cannot scroll past them.
Lamar Advertising (LAMR - Free Report) and OUTFRONT Media (OUT - Free Report) both sit in this market, but they bring different strengths to the table. Lamar is the steadier operator, with a larger revenue base, strong billboard exposure and a long record of local advertiser demand.
OUTFRONT is more of a recovery story, helped by faster recent growth in transit, digital and large urban markets. The latest quarterly results show both companies moving in the right direction, though in different ways. For investors, the choice comes down to whether they prefer Lamar’s consistency and financial flexibility or OUTFRONT’s sharper rebound and improving transit platform.
The Case for LAMR
Lamar’s first appeal is its dependable top-line engine. First-quarter 2026 net revenues rose 4.5% to $528 million, with growth across billboards, airports, transit and logo signs. It came from a larger base and showed healthy demand from both local and national advertisers. Management also noted that local and regional billboard sales have now grown for 20 straight quarters, a useful sign of repeat demand.
The company also has a strong profitability profile. Adjusted EBITDA increased 7.7% to $226.3 million, and the margin expanded to 42.9%. OUTFRONT’s rebound was sharper in the quarter, but Lamar still operates with a much higher earnings margin, helped by its heavy billboard mix and disciplined expense control. That efficiency makes each dollar of revenues more valuable.
Lamar’s balance sheet gives it another edge. Management reported net debt-to-EBITDA of about 3X, total liquidity of more than $700 million and no senior notes maturity until 2028. OUTFRONT’s net leverage is higher at 4.3X, so Lamar has more room to invest, pursue deals and support shareholder returns through different market conditions.
Growth is not missing either. Programmatic revenues grew nearly 25% in the quarter, same-board digital revenues increased 5%, and digital represented almost 31% of billboard billings. Lamar also completed 19 acquisitions for about $80 million so far in 2026 and continues to target accretive billboard deals and easements under its best locations. That mix of organic growth, digital expansion and bolt-on acquisitions keeps the story simple and attractive to investors today.
The Case for OUT
OUTFRONT’s case begins with momentum. First-quarter 2026 revenues rose 10% to $429.6 million, while adjusted OIBDA climbed 56.4% to $100.4 million. AFFO more than doubled to $61 million. Those numbers show a business moving past a weaker period and getting better operating lift from its assets. Compared with Lamar’s steadier pace, OUTFRONT offers a more visible recovery story.
Transit is the clearest improvement. Revenues in that segment rose 22.3%, led by strength in the New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“MTA”) contract, which management said grew more than 26%. Digital transit revenues also rose strongly. If the MTA business stays above its baseline revenue level, OUTFRONT can begin recouping prior screen investments, improving cash dynamics over time. This could make the platform more productive.
OUTFRONT also has a good digital growth story. Total digital revenues grew more than 11% and made up about one-third of total revenues. Programmatic and automated digital sales rose nearly 40%, showing better traction with buyers who want data, flexibility and measurable campaigns. Its big-city footprint could also benefit from events, tourism and tech advertiser demand, which gives OUTFRONT real upside if demand keeps building.
The downside is that OUTFRONT still carries more execution risk than Lamar. Transit improved sharply, but it still posted a small adjusted OIBDA loss in the quarter. Leverage was 4.3X, above Lamar’s level, and some of its first-quarter strength included billboard condemnation revenues. Its exit from a large Los Angeles billboard contract also creates some moving parts in year-over-year comparisons. Investors still need proof that progress can last longer. The turnaround is promising, but it is not yet as clean or as steady as Lamar’s model.
How Do Estimates Compare for LAMR & OUT?
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Lamar’s 2026 and 2027 sales implies year-over-year growth of 5.02% and 4.22%, respectively. The consensus mark for 2026 and 2027 funds from operations (FFO) per share has been revised meaningfully higher to $8.81 and $9.40, respectively, over the past two months, suggesting year-over-year growth of 6.66% and 6.75%, respectively.
Estimates for Lamar Advertising:
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for OUTFRONT Media’s 2026 and 2027 sales indicates year-over-year growth of 8.09% and 1.49%, respectively. The consensus mark for 2026 and 2027 FFO per share has been revised upward over the past two months to $2.26 and $2.30, respectively. The figure suggests year-over-year increases of 13.57% and 1.99%, respectively.
Estimates for OUTFRONT Media:
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Price Performance & Valuation of LAMR & OUT
So far in the quarter, Lamar shares have rallied 19%, and OUTFRONT Media stock has gained 14.5%. In comparison, the Zacks REIT and Equity Trust – Other industry has risen 11.4%, whereas the S&P 500 composite has returned 12% in the same time frame.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
LAMR is trading at a forward 12-month price-to-FFO, which is a commonly used multiple for valuing REITs, of 16.62X, which is above its one-year median of 15.40X.
OUT is presently trading at a forward 12-month price-to-FFO of 13.34X, which is also above its one-year median of 12.08X. While OUT has a Value Score of B, LAMR has a Value Score of C.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Conclusion: LAMR Has the Edge
OUTFRONT deserves credit for a much better quarter. Its transit recovery, digital push and stronger urban demand give investors a real reason to keep watching the name. Still, Lamar looks like the better stock to consider. It has a larger and steadier revenue base, stronger margins, lower leverage and more room to keep acquiring assets while supporting its dividend policy.
Lamar’s growth may look less dramatic than OUTFRONT’s rebound, but it comes with fewer moving parts and a more proven model. For investors seeking exposure to OOH advertising REITs, Lamar offers the cleaner and more dependable choice in this matchup. Estimate revisions also point in the same direction.
LAMR carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), whereas OUT has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Note: Anything related to earnings presented in this write-up represents funds from operations (FFO) — a widely used metric to gauge the performance of REITs.